Author Archives: Humanrights

Conference on 40th Anniversary of Right of Peoples to Peace To commemorate Human Rights Day

Posted on by
Reply

Objectives

At the same time, the year 2024 marks forty years since the Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace (A/RES/39/11, 11 November 1984) and the preparation for the International Year of Peace and Trust, 2025 (A/RES/78/266), both resolutions being directly linked to the development of human rights in an environment of awareness for peace against violence.

Considering the current moment of global political instability with repercussions in all areas of the social and intellectual domain, it is proposed that the “Conference on the Right of Peoples to Peace” be held, allowing for a broad debate on issues related to the theme, such as, for example, the culture of peace, sense of peace in restricted system, human rights, democracy and governance, documenta)on and methods, education, etc.

Joint Project
a) Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa (Autonomous University of Lisbon)
b) RC#26 on Human Rights from IPSA
c) Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu (Adam Mickiewicz University in
Poznań)
d) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (University Carlos III of Madrid)
e) South Asia Research Institute for Minorities — SARIM

Scientific Board
Prof. Dr. Jedrzej Skrzypczak, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan and Chair of RC26 on Human Rights IPSA

Prof. Dr. Oscar Perez de la Fuente, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and Vice-Chair of RC26 on Human Rights IPSA

Prof. Dr. Alex Sander Pires, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa and Chair-Elect of RC26 IPSA

Date
10 December 2024, between 19h and 22h (Lisbon Time)
System
Hybrid.

Schedule
19:00 — 19:10: Opening.
Prof. Dr. Alex Sander Pires, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa and Chair-Elect of RC26 IPSA

19:10 —19:30: Dr. Patrice Vahard, Director of BCNUDH BUREAU CONJOINT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L’HOMME

“UBUNTU in its relation to peace and its values.”

19:30 — 19:45: Prof. Dr. Jedrzej Skrzypczak, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan and Chair of RC26 on Human Rights IPSA

“The right of people to peace in the pre-war period: 40th anniversary of UND
Declaration.”

19:45 — 20:00: Prof. Dr. Oscar Perez de la Fuente, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and Vice-Chair of RC26 on Human Rights IPSA

“Peace, war, law and Politics.”

20:00 — 20:15: Prof. Dr. José António Frías Montoya, Universidad de Salamanca

“Documentation in Human Rights (in Spanish/en Español).”

20:15 — 20:30: Prof. Dr. Anju Gupta, JECRC University and Member of RC26 IPSA Board

“Women’s rights and gender equality in South Asia.”

20:30 — 20:45: Prof. Dr. Alexandre Miguel Mestre, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa

“Olympic truce and the peace of peoples.”

20:45 — 21:00: Dr. Furqan Ahmed, South Asia Research Ins)tute for Minori)es and Secretary of RC26 IPSA Board

“Religious Nationalism as a Threat to the Right to Peace in Digital Spaces:
defending minorities on social media.”

21:00 — 21:15: Prof. Dr. Deepak Mewada, JECRC University

“Human Rights Day: Reflecting on progress and challenges.”

21:15 — 21:30: Prof. Dr. Lier Pires Ferreira, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

“Peace in times of hegemonic rupture (In Portuguese / Em Português).”

21:30 — 21:45: Prof. Carlos Imbrosio Filho, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa

“From right to peace to R2P: bridging aspirantions and obligations in preventing atrocities and nuclear catastrophes.”

21:45 — 22:00: Final Remarks and closure

The evolution of the position and role of human rights in political systems

Posted on by
Reply
Obraz zawierający tekst, Czcionka, Grafika, clipart Opis wygenerowany automatycznie

RC26 IPSA Interim Conference:

‘The evolution of the position and role of human rights in political systems’

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, Słubice Campus,

Academic directors: Jedrzej Skrzypczak, Oscar Pérez de la Fuente

28 November 2024 (hybrid mode)

Link to connect: https://eu.bbcollab.com/guest/0bd221929b1e4366af31417175e7cf58

More information: https://humanrights.webphilosophia.com/archivos/246

THE CONFERENCE PROGRAM
Panel 1 “The position of human rights in global and regional political systems”
o 11.30-13.00 Warsaw/Madrid time
Chair: Prof. Oscar Pérez de la Fuente, (Carlos III University of Madrid, Vice-Chair of RC26 IPSA),

  1. Dr. Michael Kilburn (Endicott College Beverly, MA USA)
    Anarchy, State, and Utopia: the D/Evolution of the Position and Role of Human Rights in Political Systems.”
  2. Prof. Peter Smuk, (Széchenyi István University Faculty of Law and Political Sciences)
    Integrity of Democratic Process – New Narratives on Sovereignty Protection?
  3. Prof. Semahagn Abebe, (Endicott College Beverly, MA USA),
    Double Standards in International Responses to Human Rights Violations: A Case Study of Ethiopia
    Discussant: Prof. Cassius Guimaraes Chai, (Universidade Federal do Maranhão /PPGDIR/Law/ /PPGAERO/Aerospace Engineering/ and Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (PPGD/Law), member of RC26 IPSA Board)

  5. Panel 2 “The next generations of human rights – attempts at diagnosis and prediction”
    o 13.15-14.45 Warsaw/Madrid time
    Chair: Prof. Anju Gupta, (Head of Department of Political Science JECRC, University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India; member of RC26 IPSA board)
  6. Dr Marco Marsili (Research Institute for International Studies, Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Cà Foscari University of Venice, Italy).
    Safeguarding the Future: Developing the Next Generation of Human Rights for Digital and Cognitive Domains
  7. Prof. Ravisankar R S (Department of Political Science, NSS College, Pandalam, affiliated to the University of Kerala, India)
    The Next Generation Human Rights in India: A Troubleshooting Approach
  8. Katarzyna Sypień (Project Assistant, Jagiellonian University, Poland, ),
    Climate Change and the Right to Exist: Examining Collective Rights and Territorial Sovereignty in Vulnerable Asian States
    Discussant: Prof. Jedrzej Skrzypczak, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland, Chair of RC26 IPSA)

  10. Panel 3 “The role of human rights in national political systems. A cross-continental perspective”
    15.15-16.30 Warsaw/Madrid time
    Chair: Prof. Alex Sander Xavier Pires (The Law Department of the Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, chair elect of RC26 IPSA)
  11. Prof. Iwona Wrońska, (Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland),
    Canadian Immigration Policies and the Protection of Human Rights
  12. Dorina Anna Tóth (Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
    The Bumpy Roads of the Fight against the Exploitation of Women: A Historical Examination of the Regulation of Prostitution in Hungary
  13. Dr Tomasz Litwin, (Ignatianum University in Cracow)
    The Polish Dispute over Abortion from the Human Rights Perspective
  14. Dr Tomasz Wicha (the Department of Theory and Methodology of Political Science and Administration, the Institute of Political Science and Administration, Faculty of Political Science and Journalism, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland)
    The issue of the protection of human rights on the political market in Poland in the context of the migration crisis on the border with Belarus (since 2021) and the Russian – Ukrainian war (since 2022)
  15. Aleksandra Oczkowicz, (PhD student ,Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland),
    The Role of Independent Trade Unions in Belarus as Social Activists Post-2020 Protests
    Discussant: Furqan Ahmed (South Asia Research Institute for Minorities SARIM, Karachi, Pakistan, Secretary of RC26 Board)

  1. Panel 4 “Human rights in concepts of de-globalisation and re-globalisation”
    o 16.45-18.15 Warsaw/Madrid time
    Chair: Prof. Cassius Guimaraes Chai, (Universidade Federal do Maranhão /PPGDIR/Law/ /PPGAERO/Aerospace Engineering/ and Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (PPGD/Law), member of RC26 IPSA Board)
  2. Oscar Pérez de la Fuente (Carlos III University of Madrid)
    Re-globalisation as an Emerging Paradigm for Human Rights
  3. Prof. Alex Sander Xavier Pires (Law Department of the Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa),
    Human Rights in the Concept of Sustainable Development
  4. Furqan Ahmed (South Asia Research Institute for Minorities SARIM, Karachi, Pakistan)
    Human Rights in the Era of Deglobalization: Tensions Between National Sovereignty and International Norms online
  5. Prof. Jedrzej Skrzypczak, prof., Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland,
    Deglobalisation trends and the protection of human rights in contempory politicals systems
  6. Discussant: Dr Radwan Ziadeh (Arab Center – Washington D.C., USA, member of RC26 IPSA board)

Scientific Board
o Prof. Oscar Pérez de la Fuente (Carlos III University of Madrid) – chair
o Prof. Magdalena Musiał-Karg ( AMU) – vice -chair,
o Prof. Jędrzej Skrzypczak (AMU) – vice-chair
o Prof. Natasza Lubik-Reczek (AMU)
o Prof. Andrzej Stelmach (AMU)
o Prof. Krzysztof Urbaniak (AMU)


Organisational Committee
o Prof. Magdalena Musiał-Karg (AMU) – chair, Prof. Natasza Lubik-Reczek (AMU)- vice-chair
o Prof. Jędrzej Skrzypczak (AMU) Emil Plewa – (secretary of the conference)

The UN at 79: Navigating Neutrality in a Divided World

Posted on by
Reply

Furqan Ahmed 

Senior Research Associate, South Asia Research Institute for Minorities (SARIM). Secretary, Research Committee 26 RC26 – Human Rights, General Research Coordinator, International Association of Political Science Students, IAPSS.

Introduction:

October 24, 2024 marks the commemoration of the ‘United Nations Day’ and this blog is dedicated to celebrate the birth of United Nations with an aim as whistleblower, highlight the challenges the UN faces in effectively addressing global peace in a divided world. The emergence of the United Nations took place on October 24, 1945 as a result of one of the most horrific wars human beings have ever witnessed. The United Nations (UN) was established by its member states, which then created a new primary body of international law and human rights that is regulated by the International Bill of Human Rights, a set of five treaties that each state has ratified in compliance with its own domestic laws on foreign commitments. 

Before we begin our dissection on why the UN is failing in maintaining global peace, we will dive into some of its major achievements, which are tantamount to success rather than failure

Here are three pillars, which define the UN’s significance achievements:  

  1. Fight against poverty, hunger, and health related initiatives: The United Nation provides food and financial assistance to over 80 million people, while, it provide aid to more than 69 million people who have fled their homeland due to persecution, conflict, or human rights violation. Along with that, the UN facilitates 45% of the world’s children with vaccines, saving as estimated 2 to 3 million lives.  
  2. Efforts for upholding Human Rights through: 
  3. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
  4. International Convention on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
  5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  6. Decolonization: Before its inception in 1945, there was a massive network of Colonizers across the world, 750 million people lived under the colonial regime. The numbers have been trickled down to 2 million people today. 

Despite these monumental achievements, the UN is still under immense pressure, be it the financial crunch, post Covid-19 and the other bulging challenges regarding maintaining a massive influx of migrants caused by two of contemporary regional conflicts of Russo-Ukraine War and Middle-East crisis, and climate change. 

Critical Analysis: 

The outbreak of the Russo-Ukraine war on February 24, 2022, and the ongoing crisis in Gaza are stark reminders that contemporary conflicts are not isolated events but rather the culmination of decades of unresolved tensions. As war experts warn of the potential for these conflicts to escalate into a global confrontation, including the frightening prospect of World War III, it is crucial to examine the effectiveness of international organizations tasked with maintaining peace.

The purpose of the following commentary is to examine the causes, which is making the UN a ‘toothless tiger. At first place, why it [UN] failed to prevent these two recent wars, while on the second place, why this intergovernmental organization is failing to maintain neutrality in establishing global peace.

Numerous independent reports document gross human rights violations in conflict zones, where innocent civilians bear the brunt of war. The UN’s failure to act decisively in these situations raises critical questions about its effectiveness as a peacekeeping body. Why has the UN struggled to prevent recent wars, and what specific cases illustrate its compromised neutrality?

“The author also gave a reference to his interaction with Prof. Dr. Heinz-Dietrich Steinmeyer in a podcast that took place on October 10, 2024 titled “Social Security and Minority Rights: Lessons from Europe for South Asia”. In response to a question to Prof. Steinmeyer, that “do you really think that UN is failing to maintain neutrality and in establishing global peace”, the guest responded that, is the world ready to live a peaceful life, that is the reason UN is becoming extremely compulsive in maintaining neutrality, because you sometimes have to deal with the good-one and the bad ones”

Is the UN on the verge of become the League of Nations 2.0?  

The following proposition will explore the similarities in the failure of the League of Nations with its replacing counterpart, the United Nations, in maintaining global peace and why it is heading towards repeating the same mistakes, which caused the demise of the League of Nations and the outbreak of World War II. 

Historical Background: 

Historically, the League of Nations provides a compelling case study of the failures in global governance. Established after World War I to prevent future conflicts, the League ultimately faltered in the 1930s, unable to respond effectively to aggression from rising powers. This historical precedent raises important questions about the current role of the United Nations (UN) and its ability to learn from past mistakes. The main reason gave birth to the creation of an intergovernmental organization, known as the United Nations, was the miserable failure of the League, the first intergovernmental organization that was established after the World War I, which was built of the principles of maintaining international peace, achieving international cooperation, and being a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations.  

Reasons behind the failures of League of Nations: 

The League of Nations was sandwiched between aggressor nations [Germany, Italy, and Japan] and the abysmal performance of its own members [Britain and France], failing to appease Hitler – actions that arguably led to the outbreak of World War II. The member states became hostile to each other as a result of the ‘World Economic Depression’ in the late 1930s. The overtaking of fascist dictatorships in Germany, Italy, and Japan, which were intended for empire-building, and these countries defied the League.

   

Can the UN adapt its strategies to overcome historical pitfalls and effectively maintain global peace in the face of contemporary challenges?

 

 “76 years and half a trillion dollars later, the international community is divided on the effectiveness of the United Nations. Overall, the UN has a positive international image but the partisan divide over supporting the UN has widened, particularly in the United States. The United States’ perception of the UN is important since the United States is the largest donor to the UN and accounts for roughly 20% of the UN’s collective budget”

Katelyn Balakir

The effectiveness of the United Nations remains a contentious issue, with a positive international image overshadowed by a widening partisan divide, particularly in the U.S., which contributes 20% of the UN’s budget. While the UN has achieved significant successes in humanitarian aid, human rights, and decolonization, it faces critical limitations, including enforcement challenges, Security Council inaction, and perceptions of Western dominance, all of which hinder its peacekeeping efforts and future operations amid financial constraints and fluctuating political support from member states.

Role in Peacekeeping Missions Globally: 

Rwanda Genocide (1994): The genocide of Rwanda in 1994, despite wary of impeding violence, the mandate holder, the United Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNIMAR), lacked resources and the UN’s reluctance to mediate vehemently exhibited genocide to escalate, which caused innocent civil casualties.  

Bosnia (1992-1995):  The UN even couldn’t even protect its safe zones for civilians in Srebrenica; the Bosnian Serb forces violated attacked Peacekeepers from Netherlands [Dutch]. As a result of the UN’s inactiveness, more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were massacred. 

Syria (2011 Present):  The ineffectiveness of mediating the current conflict in Syria presents a case study of human rights defenders. Additionally, the use of chemical weapons and the humanitarian crisis have further complicated the UN’s neutrality, as various member states have been accused of using the UN as a platform to advance their geopolitical interests, rather than genuinely seeking a resolution.

Myanmar (Rohingya Crisis):  Once again, the UN’s ineptness forming a robust political stance against the Myanmar Government raised disbelief about its commitment to fairness. That is why the Rohingya Crisis is still unsettled and the UN faces hostile response for being slow in response. Critics argue that the UN’s focus on humanitarian aid has overshadowed the need for accountability and justice. 

Yemen (2015-present): This crisis is regarded as perhaps world’s worst humanitarian crisis. The United Nations is under extreme pressure for failing to hold parties accountable for violations of International Laws, particularly the Saudi-led coalition’s actions. It is perceived that the UN holds soft corner or passive in resolving and addressing these issues. 

These conflicts and crises provided the intricacies and challenges the UN faces in sustaining impartiality whereas resolving complicated conflicts. They accentuate the need for reorganization and a preemptive approach to conflict resolution to rebuild trust in its capacity to mediate fairly and effectively.

In conclusion, as we navigate an increasingly volatile world, it is imperative to critically assess the role of the UN and other international organizations. By learning from the lessons of the past and addressing their shortcomings, we may foster a more effective approach to maintaining global peace and security. 

Title: Biotechnology in the New Age: Exploring Its Synergy with AI, Economy, Policy, Entrepreneurship, and IPR

Posted on by
Reply

                                                                            Anju Gupta.

                                                                                  Head Department of Political Science

                                                                                  JECRC University, JAIPUR (India)

Introduction:

Ah, biotechnology—a field that started out studying the tiny mysteries of life and has now become a full-fledged celebrity in science, stealing the limelight from even AI and blockchain at times. But don’t worry, this isn’t one of those stuffy science blogs. We’re here to mix biochemistry with a dash of humor and dive into how biotech is cozying up to some new-age trends like AI, economics, policy-making, entrepreneurship, and the ever-important intellectual property rights (IPR). Spoiler alert: It’s a fascinating ride.

 AI and Biotechnology: The Dynamic Duo We Didn’t Know We Needed

It was inevitable that Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology would become best friends eventually. AI has been flexing its muscles in almost every industry imaginable, but in biotech, it’s like that one friend who brings the coolest gadgets to a dinner party.

– Drug Discovery: AI helps biotech companies find new drugs faster than a teenager skipping through Netflix options. By analyzing massive amounts of biological data, AI can predict which molecules are most likely to be the next big cure. While biotech is occupied with lab work, AI is there to whisper in its ear, ‘Hey, give this one a try.’ You might like it.”

– Genetic Engineering: AI-powered CRISPR technologies are on the rise, and no, we’re not talking about a new kitchen appliance. With AI’s help, scientists can now edit genes with the precision of a chef slicing a perfect avocado. This means better crops, healthier humans, and probably a few overly excited startup founders.

Together, AI and biotechnology are like Batman and Robin, except instead of fighting crime, they’re solving the mysteries of life. And no capes are involved—yet.

 The Economy: Biotech’s Financial Glow-Up

Biotechnology isn’t just for science nerds in lab coats anymore. No, it’s a full-blown economic powerhouse. Investors are investing in biotech startups as if it were the next cryptocurrency boom (with less volatility, mostly).

– Investment Trends: Biotechnology startups are now a hot ticket item. Venture capitalists are chasing them down like they’re handing out free kombucha at a tech conference. Investors are drawn to Biotech’s promise of revolutionary cures, treatments, and eco-friendly solutions. The sector is expected to hit new highs—think more IPOs and a few more yachts for those early investors.

– Job Creation: Biotech is not just creating new drugs and therapies; it’s creating jobs. From lab researchers to marketing gurus (because even gene therapy needs a brand), the industry is bolstering the economy like a protein shake for job growth.

Sure, we may not see biotechnology sponsoring the Super Bowl halftime show anytime soon, but give it a few years. 

 Policy-Making: When Science Meets Suit-and-Tie World

If you think biotech is complicated, try navigating the maze of policies and regulations around it. Policymakers act as the grown-ups in the room, trying to figure out how to allow biotech to proceed without causing a Jurrasic Park scenario.

– Ethical Debates: Should we tweak human genes? Is it okay to modify crops? These aren’t just dinner table conversation starters anymore—they’re real issues that governments are tackling. And unlike your family’s Thanksgiving debates, these come with actual consequences.

– Regulatory Hurdles: New biotech breakthroughs like CRISPR or lab-grown meat can’t just be tossed into the market. Regulations are necessary to ensure safety, but they also can slow down innovation. It’s a bit like having to explain every step of a complicated dance to a judge before you can actually perform it. Fun? Not so much. Necessary? Absolutely.

On the bright side, once policy catches up, biotech innovations usually make a splash. Plus, we can all agree that no one wants unregulated genetic experiments running amok. Thanks, government.

 Entrepreneurship: Startups, Unicorns, and Biotech Millionaires

In the old days, if you wanted to make millions, you started an app or launched a podcast. But now, biotech entrepreneurship is the new gold rush. Forget social media influencers—bio-entrepreneurs are the next superstars.

– Startups Everywhere: Biotech startups are springing up like mushrooms after a rainstorm. Whether it’s gene-editing therapies, next-gen agriculture, or synthetic biology, there’s a startup for it. And these aren’t just hobby projects; many of them have real potential to change the world (and maybe even get a Netflix documentary).

– Challenges: Sure, starting a biotech company might sound glamorous, but it’s not all pipettes and venture capital. The costs are high, the timelines are long, and there’s always the small issue of actually getting your product through regulatory approvals. Still, for those who can navigate the murky waters, the rewards can be astronomical. 

Biotech entrepreneurs are living the dream—if your dream includes FDA paperwork and petri dishes.

 Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): The Unsung Hero of Biotech

In biotechnology, intellectual property rights (IPR) are as important as lab coats. Without strong IPR protection, innovation in biotech would look like a game of Monopoly without the rules—and trust us, nobody wants that chaos.

– Patents Galore: Biotech inventions are patent-heavy. Whether it’s a new cancer drug or a genetically modified crop, patents help companies protect their work. But navigating biotech patents can feel like playing chess against a very strict librarian—one wrong move, and your company could be out.

– Challenges: IPR in biotech can get thorny. Who owns the rights to a modified gene? Can someone really patent a part of the human body? These types of questions are what make IPR lawyers both necessary and somewhat intimidating. But at the end of the day, strong IPR ensures that the people who spend years developing new technologies get to reap the rewards.

Just remember: in biotech, patents aren’t just a piece of paper—they’re the backbone of innovation.

Conclusion:

The focus of biotechnology is no longer solely on curing diseases or creating genetically modified plants. In ways that are both surprising and exciting, this field is interconnecting with some of the most significant new-age trends, including AI, the economy, policy-making, entrepreneurship, and intellectual property rights. And while the journey might be full of twists, turns, and the occasional government form, biotech is undoubtedly carving its place in the future.

In the end, whether you’re a budding bio-entrepreneur, a policy-maker scratching your head, or just someone curious about the future of humanity, biotechnology is a field worth watching—and maybe even chuckling about along the way.

A World in Peril: Climate Change and the Erosion of Human Rights

Posted on by
Reply

 

Dr. Uzma Shujjat

Director, Area Study Centre for Europe

University of Karachi

Climate Change is a human rights threat with causes and consequences that cross borders; thus, it requires a global response underpinned by international solidarity. States should share resources, knowledge, and technologies to address climate change. Climate change is one of the greatest threats to human rights of our generation, posing a serious threat to the fundamental rights to life, health, food, and an adequate standard of living of individuals and communities across the world. 

The dramatic impact of climate change has exposed devastating clarity and the integral of a healthy environment to the benefit of all our other rights. Climate change is intimately linked with human rights because of its effect on not only the environment but also our own well-being and ultimately our survival. Big powers, especially from higher-income countries with the greatest historical responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions, are not fulfilling their responsibilities.  

World leaders, especially those from the developed world, have the greatest responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions and do not fulfill their legal obligations to address climate change and help, in the long run, adapt to the change that has already occurred.  If these developed ones are not going to respond seriously and act quickly, the effects of the unprecedented weather conditions of frequent heat waves, excessive flooding, and rainfall will continue to rise and worsen over time, creating a threat for current and future generations. Thus, the failure of governments to act in a responsible manner to address the crises accompanying scientific evidence and frequent dialers and predictions may well be the biggest intergovernmental human rights violation in human history. 

In addition to the Government, the corporate sector is responsible for addressing and respecting human rights in the context of climate change.  The impact of climate change includes warming temperatures, changes in precipitation, and increases in the frequency or intensity of extreme weather, and rising sea levels.

These impacts threaten our health by affecting the food we eat, water we drink, air we breathe, and weather we experience.  The human actions that affect climate change, such as burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests, and farming livestock, have increasingly influenced the climate and the earth’s temperature. According to Resolution 53/6 July 2023, the council recognized the importance of minimizing and addressing the loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change. 

The dangers of climate change are particularly important for Children. Climate change has threatened livelihoods in the last decade, and international, regional, and national Human Rights bodies have recorded a rise in human rights violations in accordance with climate change. Here, we consider some high-risk human rights violations that are solely connected with livelihoods. 

Access to clean water climate change is meagerly affecting and will continue to affect rising trends and the availability, accessibility, and affordability of water. This was mostly due to natural degradation changes and anthropogenic factors. Large corporate sectors are highly responsible for large-scale damage to the water system, contamination, and poor quality of water, which are sources of amenities. The right to life and climate change have a vital connection; sudden extreme weather events due to changes in the natural system, such as heat waves, wildfires, excessive flooding, and rainfall, usually lead to people losing their lives, resulting in a very high death toll, right to health, and food.      

Political Impact of Climate Change: The Case of Bangladesh

Posted on by
Reply

Dr. M. Shahrukh Shahnawaz

Writer is a lawyer, 

Member of the Environmental Committee of the Sindh High Court Bar Association Karachi,

&

The Faculty of Department of International Relations, University of Karachi

.

The interim government of Bangladesh under Muhammad Yunus, after the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajid by the student protest, is facing its first challenge, which is the death, devastation, and destruction caused by the recent floods, as nearly 300,000 people are taking refuge in emergency shelters, while the student leader in the cabinet accused India of deliberately releasing water from dams. 

The fall of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajid is also a stark reminder that economic growth and development do not ensure political stability if human rights are being trampled. According to the Human Rights Watch, in 2023, ahead of the 2024 general elections, the authorities started making mass arrests of opposition members and using excessive force against protestors.  

Amnesty International reported that the government intensified its crackdown on the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly ahead of elections, including abusing the Digital Security Act and other legislation to target journalists and human rights defenders, subjecting them to arbitrary detention and torture, and not being held accountable for enforced disappearances and custodial deaths. 

However, the present interim government can face the same fate as the government of the father of Bangladesh Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1975, whose government was unable to respond to the destruction caused by the 1970 Bhola Cyclone, followed by 1974 famine, eventually leading to the declaration of emergency by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman government, followed by his assination, and a long military rule.   

The 1970 Bhola Cyclone led to the 1971 Pakistani Civil War, between West Pakistan and East Pakistan, which later turned into the 1971 Pakistan-India War, and saw the fall of Dhaka and East Pakistan, and the emergence of Bangladesh. The people of East Pakistan had many grievances from the government of West Pakistan especially the fishermen community of the East Pakistan, whose rights and plight were raised and shared by the great Faiz Ahmad Faiz, in his movie Jago Hua Savera (1959), based on the Bengali novel Padma Nadir Majhi, by Manik Bandopadhyay, which is a 1936 novel, depicted the plight of the Bengali fishermen residing on the banks of Padma river during the British colonial rule. The Bengal region paid heavy attention to British colonialism during the 1943 Bengal Famine, which killed around three million people and was a manmade disaster, primarily driven by the war policy of the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. 

Bangladesh has learned from its previous historical and political experiences pertaining to floods, famines, and cyclones, and made history when the Supreme Court of Bangladesh declared all its rivers a living entity in 2019, contributing to the development of the rights of rivers. 

Both India and Bangladesh fear China’s construction of dams in Tibet along a bend in the river, in the vicinity of the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, on the Yarlung Tsangpo River, known as the Brahmaputra River in India. For India, this project could trigger flash floods or create water scarcity, or give China strategic leverage over India on border disputes in the Himalayan mountains, while Bangladesh claims that it is more adversely affected than India, as the Brahmaputra River is important for sustaining Bangladesh’s livelihood and agriculture, especially in the dry season, potentially and possibly causing displacement. 

Both India and Bangladesh share 54 rivers and signed the Ganga Waters Treaty in December 1996, announced in 2024 that both sides had started technical negotiations to renew it. Before the government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajid toppled in August 2024, climate change caused the displacement of coastal communities, adversely affected farmers and the agriculture sector, and caused the death of farmers due to lightning. These and other environment-related causes have contributed to the uprising against the government, which has been overshadowed by student protests. The government took some remarkable steps, such as building resilient homes and providing job opportunities for climate refugees, but this was not enough.   

Bangladesh has suffered and survived many environmental disasters since British colonial rule. Its story and struggle provide lessons and warnings to other South Asian countries to seriously threaten the environment, as it has serious political implications.   The challenges for the present interim government of Bangladesh are immense, but the first one pertains to environmental disasters, exacerbated by climate change, and unless it is ready and willing to accept the environmental threat as a reality, it might end up facing the same fate as the first government of Bangladesh did in 1975.  

Equity in an Emergency: The Imperative of Climate Justice in Pakistan

Posted on by
Reply

Yasir Ali

PhD Scholar and Teaching Associate 

Department of International Relations, University of Karachi 

Amidst rising environmental catastrophes and crises, Pakistan appears to be standing on the very crossroads. Climate change and its extremely serious impacts is actually not limited to any country, as it equally hits rich and poor nations alike. However, the most vulnerable countries like Pakistan are the ones who get affected by it the most fiercely. Along with other states on earth, Pakistan faces the issue of rapid climate crisis.

The country is blessed with various ecosystems ranging from the majestic peaks of the Himalayas to the fertile plains of the Indus Valley, is endangered by this ongoing threat. Climate change is yielding more unpredictable weather occurrences, the melting of glaciers, more disastrous floods and longer regional droughts. These consequences further aggravate already marginalized communities, endangering human security and increasing its vulnerabilities.

Pakistan produces less than 1% of the greenhouse gas emissions in the world but continuously ranks in the top countries that are most vulnerable to climate change impacts as stated by the annual Global Climate Risk Index. In 2022, a catastrophic flood that submerged a notable area of Pakistan took lives of more than 1,700 people and displaced many others. Key structures such as roads, bridges, and electricity grids suffered extensive damage, and crops were devastated on millions of acres.

This is not a one-off event. It is getting worse every year, which is caused by climate change. From the 1960s till now, Pakistan has seen a general rise in average rainfall during monsoons as a result of temperature increase. According to climate models, extreme precipitation events becoming even more intense as global warming goes into its continuation. India is already the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China and has continued to show lukewarmness even at the recent COP2 inter sessions. Pakistan on the other hand has to compete with an uncertain scenario of the fast melting Hindu Kush glaciers along with a global climate emergency already looming over it.

With the country’s proliferating population and straining resources, the destabilizing effects of climate change become more pronounced. The poor households are at the greatest risk of losing their food security since the temperatures, precipitation, and extreme conditions are becoming extremely harsher causing a reduction of major crop production in some farming areas. Water shortages force millions of children to leave school and work instead for their families gathering supplies. For that they have to travel great distances to find them in remote places. This leads to youth unemployment, an upsurge in civil conflicts over resources, as well as insecurity and an increased sense of injustice.

In response to this catastrophe, Pakistan has actively engaged on the international stage, demanding climate justice and asking for global commitment in dealing with climate change issues. Pakistan’s ratification of the Paris Agreement and pledge towards the lowering of greenhouse gas emissions serve as a realization of the country’s accountability in confronting the climate crisis. Also, programs such as the Billion Tree Tsunami and the Clean Green Pakistan campaign demonstrate the government’s determination to improve the environment and development.

Nevertheless, despite the adoption of different strategies, there remain many obstacles that make it difficult for the government of Pakistan to put its climate policies into practice. The fact that the country is still largely dependent on fossil fuels, along with poor infrastructure, and the limited financial resources makes the transition to a low-carbon future a struggle. On the other hand, unequal distribution of resources increases the vulnerability of marginalized communities to climate change and thus limits their efforts to adaptation.

In order to overcome this situation, Pakistan has to make sure the climate justice has the prominence and priority in their policy-making. This means reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and creating opportunities for participation, as well as shielding the vulnerable groups with services and strategies that make them resilient. Investments in renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and climate resilient infrastructure will not only help to reduce the negative impacts of climate change, but is also essential for achieving the inclusive development. Besides, forming global partnerships with the United Nations, non-profit organizations, as well as the private companies is a very powerful way of gathering the funds and expertise for climate change improvement.

In addition, the development of Pakistan’s policy on climate justice has to be based on a pledge to protect the rights and interests of its people, now and in the future. This needs an effective leadership that will come up with cutting-edge solutions which will help in squaring with the climate alteration challenges. In the turbulence of the uncertain and changing climate, Pakistan will have a decisive role to undertake to build a more equitable and sustainable world for everyone.